As a public minister,
I often find myself at the tip of the spear when it comes to the First
Amendment. Most law enforcement are woefully ill-informed of the laws they
are supposed to be enforcing, and any person who shares their faith whether it
be public preaching , sign carrying or
the distribution of gospel materials, may
eventually find themselves in the crosshairs of the local police.
James Battle is just
such a person. A resident of the Tucson area, James was in the downtown Tucson
bus terminal on April 24, 2013. He was waiting for his wife so that both of them
could take a bus home. While waiting, he reasoned that this would be an
excellent opportunity to share his faith with interested people who are also
waiting for their bus. He traveled up and down the terminal, which is public
property, with informational Christian tracts sticking out of his shirt pocket.
By his own testimony, he didn’t approach anyone and he certainly didn’t cause a
disturbance. He simply made the information available to any interested
parties. If they were interested, he would hand them some information and engage
them in conversation if they were so inclined.
He was approached by
Tucson Police Officer Keith Atchley who told him that he couldn’t distribute
any materials without written permission from Sun Tran the company that owns the
buses. While this was being discussed a Sun Tran official came on the scene and
affirmed that ‘solicitation’ was not allowed.
James assured them he wasn’t soliciting and since he was on public
property, he was well within his rights to continue with what he was doing. But
to appease the Officer and the Sun Tran official, Mr. Battle offered to let
people take the literature from his pocket rather than hand it to them. It’s
unclear from the reports whether or not this arrangement was agreed upon, but
by all indications, the officer and the Sun Tran official both left.
Officer Atchley,
according to his own report, watched Mr. Battle through binoculars until he was
observed once again committing the heinous crime of handing a piece of paper to
another human being. The report also
says that Mr. Battle engaged a person in conversation and allowed several people to take literature from his shirt pocket. Tucson’s finest swooped in, telling James Battle “You’re the
problem”. He was charged with criminal
trespassing and ‘field released’ after signing a ticket. As an aside, the officer appears to have violated
the parameters of arrest under the criminal trespass law which would make this an
incident of false arrest. James was
ordered to leave the bus terminal or face incarceration even though he needed
the bus to get home.
Now if this fine
example of police work were where the story ended, it would just be another day
of ‘protecting and serving’ in Tucson.
Officer Atchley could shine his badge some, confident that he was
keeping the streets safe from pieces of paper. But James Battle contacted the
Center for Religious Expression who fired off a letter to both the Chief of
Police Villasenior and Daryl Cole of the Tucson Transportation Department. In
the letter Counselor Nate Kellum laid out the case for James Battle’s right to
continue his activities. They cited multiple court cases at various levels and
assured the recipients, that unless this issue was dealt with properly,
legal action would be soon to follow.
The City Attorney of
Tucson responded with a letter,which you
really need to read in it’s entiretyin order to appreciate.
After calling it an ‘alleged encounter’ ,which oddly enough generated a very real police report written by a very real Officer, the bureaucracy buckled. They
apologized. They wanted to assure Mr. Battle that he is “welcome to return and
continue his expressive activity”. They
offer to help him coordinate future activities.
They proclaimed to the world that they “value” Mr. Battle’s business. They offer two different phone numbers by
which he can get any future clarification. They seem almost on the verge of
offering him free piggy back rides.
Now the reason this
encounter ( sorry, alleged encounter) turned out so differently than it could
have is because, although not a rabble-rouser, James Battle knew what his
rights are. He stood his ground and used the rule of law and the
Constitution to make his case for
him. As law enforcement becomes
increasingly about political correctness
and revenue generation and decreasingly
about the protection of individual
liberties, there is a lesson to be learned here. The chances are you will have a police
encounter sooner or later, and when you
do will you be ready?