When I wrote the book SWINDLED, I made the case that the GOP wasn't the party of freedom that it claimed to be , but rather a loose coalition of power brokers and money movers that, although ostensibly committed to slightly less government, where so terrified by the candidacy of Ron Paul that they committed a whole slew of atrocities to block his nomination. These atrocities included voter fraud, financial shenanigans, and the skirting of federal election laws. Over and over again in primary after primary I showed that a handful of people flipped switches and pulled levers in an attempt to derail the most serious liberty element the Republican Party has seen in decades from establishing any real presence under the tent. One such individual is a man named Reince Priebus.
Once upon a time, Priebus, but the general counsel for the national Republican Party, but Priebus's real skill seems to be fund raising. In December of 2010, he stepped down as general counsel for the RNC so he could run for chariman. In a letter to the delegates he said "I will keep expenses low. I will put in strong and serious controls. We will
raise the necessary funds to make sure we are successful. We will work to regain
the confidence of our donor base and I will personally call our major donors to
ask them to rejoin our efforts at the RNC." Having secured the job, Priebus was true to his goal, cutting the party debt by almost half, raising over $50 million dollars. He brought some high level donors on board, was praised by Ed Gillispie as being "on message" and having done "a great job at raising money, which is the principal role of the RNC chairman."
Deep pocket donors give money to political campaigns for one of three reasons. One reason is protection money, which is why large corporations routinely finance both sides of the aisle. No matter which stooge wins, he's less likely to bite the hand that has been feeding him. The other two reasons are closely related; access and influence. You pay a candidate so that when he wins, he will take your phone calls and then listen to you. As Louisiana governor Earl K. Long famously said " I don't buy senators, I rent them. It's cheaper." Very rarely are deep pocket donors motivated by principal or genuine excitement over a cause. Men like Priebus understand this, and court these tendencies. The last thing Priebus needs is an actual grassroots movement that is spontaneous, and can't be either controlled, steered, or tapped for large donations. Enter the Ron Paul Revolution.
As the preparations began for the 2012 election, Priebus is the individual who pushed for Nevada to move their caucus date from January to February. Nevada has always been a place sympathetic to the liberty message, and even with a large Nevada Mormon population that would tend to tilt towards Romney, Ron Paul campaign organizers had reason to expect great things. But the GOP machinery, headed by Priebus engaged in all sorts of
monkey business, including changing the times the polls were open and
announcing a Romney victory when only 5% of the vote had been counted and several counties ( including Paul stronghold Clark County) still hadn't reported in. The state GOP chairperson resigned in the middle of the night while the vote was still going on. The hour-by-hour account makes for compelling reading. Despite all this Paul wound up finishing 2nd behind Romney, and later snagged the majority of delegates at the state convention, effectively winning the state.
Oh, but dear friends, the last chapter had not been written yet, because Mr. Priebus ,being the money man that he is, formed a thing called 'Team Nevada'. Priebus even wrote their press release saying "
“Nevada is a critical state in the upcoming
elections, and that is why the Republican Party is expanding our voter contact
and volunteer programs across the state,” The purported purpose of Team Nevada was to expand RNC outreach in the state. The real reason was to funnel money away from the Nevada Republican Party, with its Paulian sympathies, into the coffers of the Romney campaign. Paul might have won the state, but the money was going to Romney.
Rolling into the Tampa convention, the national party was struggling with impromptu and possibly illegal rule changes that finally managed to successfully block Paul's nomination. One of the men most opposed to the procedural malfeasance going on was Morton Blackwell. Blackwell was actually a Romney supporter, but felt that the rule changed behind closed doors the night before the convention at the behest of Romney s lawyer were sinister and 'un-Republcian'. He was blocked, delayed, and stuck on a bus for 3 hours while John Sununu went into hiding, lest anyone present him with a minority report challenging these new rules. The end result was the nomination of Mitt "I am not a robot" Romney , who was easily trounced by Barack Obama.
The reason I go briefly through all this history is this; 2016 will soon be here, and like the battering husband that swears he'll never hit you again, the GOP will try to convince you they have changed. They have not . In fact, they have changed so little that Priebus and Blackwell are facing off over yet another round of rule changes. Priebus has been making the talk-show rounds denouncing convenient GOP boogey-man ( boogey-woman?) Hilary Clinton for everything that could possibly be wrong with the world in an attempt to pre-empt her political ambitions. This is vastly more pragamtic than focusing on the 'nar-a-dimes-worth-of-difference' between the two parties. He is flipping switches and pulling levers as we speak, and those GOP 2016 hopefuls who want access to the war chest of funds have to court him, and have to say the right things. They will have to either endorse the warfare state or soften their opposition to it. They will have to agree to long-standing state pillaging programs like Social Security, and be willing to blur the numbers on issues like immigration. The staus quo will not be challenged, only nibbled at the edges with convoluted solutions that only merely shift inappropriate state power from one pocket to another. They will do all this while men like Priebus try to convince you that there is an Islamicist under every bush and only a robot with an 'R' after his name can save you. They will claim tea party roots while they pocket vast rivers of money from corporate donors who then will expect sympathy at best, and corporate welfare at worst.
The same people are still in charge of the GOP machinery as were in charge of the machinery in 2012. Don't be fooled.
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Politics Is An Evil Business
Several years back I was accosted at a street festival by a local politician who was running for state representative. I'm not sure if they were already an incumbent or not, but they asked me what they could do for me up at the capitol. I told them they could leave me alone. I told them to not pass any more laws and to get rid of the ones they had. They assured me they were big advocates of 'limited government'. What they were really advocates of was big campaign contributions from corporate welfare hopefuls. They were handily elected and proceeded to busy themselves with 'bringing home the bacon' and 'making friends' because after all, that's how you get things done. Life marched on.
A few years later, with Obamacare looming, a friend of mine decided to cast his hat into the ring and challenge the incumbent. This fellow was a true blue liberty advocate, a reader of Mises and Hayek. In fact, this guy was the guy who loaned me Tom Wood's book on nullification. We were excited, and my whole family got behind this campaign. It was a heady beginning. He told me that his plan was to run for one term, make a bunch of people mad, and then return home. The incumbent was status quo, and our friend was a dangerous outsider. Not everybody involved in the campaign was excited about his libertarian roots. From the beginning I saw that his extremism was a source of heartburn for the people that were trying to actually get him elected. As the campaign wore on he was asked to tone down the rhetoric by his campaign advisers while the small crowd of crazies from the living room encouraged him to continue fighting the good fight.
What happened next may have been the worst thing to happen to him. He won. He did fight the good fight for a while, but the wheels of the well-funded machinery began to wear at him in the state capitol. The things he wanted to get done were blocked and stymied at every turn by 'conservatives' who weren't advocates for liberty, but they were advocates of 'limited government'. His chances of repealing things and nullifying things grew more and more minute . I specifically remember a heartbreaking conversation we had when he told me that the Republicans in my state would never allow Obamacare to be nullified, and it was a waste of time to try. I thought something that I did not say. I thought 'well then why are you running for re-election?'.
Speaking of re-election, the former incumbent financed a primary opponent against him, and he squeaked out a victory. Somewhere in the middle of that he experienced some minor legislative victories (however you define victory), and began to be liked in the capitol. The people that opposed him and blocked him in the beginning began to advise him and endorse his ideas. I told him in the grocery store one day that he was no longer the dangerous outsider; he was the incumbent. Along the way he pushed for funding to help bring home some bacon for his district. he began to talk about the importance of a politician providing jobs for the community. He fell out with the local Tea Party group that he had been an early member of. He broke a campaign promise to vote against a tax increase, claiming he had inside information about how necessary the tax was. He began to attend Republican dinners and fundraisers. He began to prepare to run for a third term.
The old incumbent and some well-heeled friends of theirs mounted yet another establishment pro-corporate welfare candidate against him in the primary. He was put in a position to prove all the good things he had done in his first two terms. This is measured by how much money you bring back home, because its hard to argue for all the things you prevented from happening after all. He sent out slick multi-colored mailers saying how he has been endorsed by all the GOP hierarchy in my state. I'm sure he'll do well in the primary, and I'm supposed to go vote in a couple of hours but I don't know what I'm going to do. I refuse to vote for his opponent, but my friend has become , unfortunately, the lesser of two evils.I say that knowing that, in all probability he will read this.
Please understand that all of this breaks my heart. I really like the guy. We love his family, and I'm sure he thinks he's stayed by the stuff. I know the typical wisdom is that you do what you have to do to get the job done. The typical thinking is that without powerful friends, without playing the game you can't get anything accomplished. I'm sure he would make the argument that it takes a lot to get there, and it takes a lot to stay there. I'm certain the case could be made that he wasn't elected to represent just the libertarians, but the whole district..
My point in all this is not that my friend got caught up in pragmatism, but rather that politics is a horrible filthy, comprising business. You have to go day in and day out and deal with people who have made it their life's work the practice of acquiring power over other men. What are the odds they won't get any power over you? They charm and manipulate for a living. What are the odds you can carry that fire in your bosom and not get burned? How can you hope to escape without selling off at least a portion of your soul?
If government isn't the answer, then getting involved in government cannot possibly be the answer. Those of us that truly want liberty cannot worry and fret ourselves with running for office. The odds aren't that you will convert the machinery to the cause of liberty; the odds are that you will be converted. You will be assimilated, and you might not even realize it. If you feel yourself in any danger of 'playing the game', your only hope is to resign and run as far away from the halls of power as you can. Let lesser men seek power over other men, we've got a world to build.
A few years later, with Obamacare looming, a friend of mine decided to cast his hat into the ring and challenge the incumbent. This fellow was a true blue liberty advocate, a reader of Mises and Hayek. In fact, this guy was the guy who loaned me Tom Wood's book on nullification. We were excited, and my whole family got behind this campaign. It was a heady beginning. He told me that his plan was to run for one term, make a bunch of people mad, and then return home. The incumbent was status quo, and our friend was a dangerous outsider. Not everybody involved in the campaign was excited about his libertarian roots. From the beginning I saw that his extremism was a source of heartburn for the people that were trying to actually get him elected. As the campaign wore on he was asked to tone down the rhetoric by his campaign advisers while the small crowd of crazies from the living room encouraged him to continue fighting the good fight.
What happened next may have been the worst thing to happen to him. He won. He did fight the good fight for a while, but the wheels of the well-funded machinery began to wear at him in the state capitol. The things he wanted to get done were blocked and stymied at every turn by 'conservatives' who weren't advocates for liberty, but they were advocates of 'limited government'. His chances of repealing things and nullifying things grew more and more minute . I specifically remember a heartbreaking conversation we had when he told me that the Republicans in my state would never allow Obamacare to be nullified, and it was a waste of time to try. I thought something that I did not say. I thought 'well then why are you running for re-election?'.
Speaking of re-election, the former incumbent financed a primary opponent against him, and he squeaked out a victory. Somewhere in the middle of that he experienced some minor legislative victories (however you define victory), and began to be liked in the capitol. The people that opposed him and blocked him in the beginning began to advise him and endorse his ideas. I told him in the grocery store one day that he was no longer the dangerous outsider; he was the incumbent. Along the way he pushed for funding to help bring home some bacon for his district. he began to talk about the importance of a politician providing jobs for the community. He fell out with the local Tea Party group that he had been an early member of. He broke a campaign promise to vote against a tax increase, claiming he had inside information about how necessary the tax was. He began to attend Republican dinners and fundraisers. He began to prepare to run for a third term.
The old incumbent and some well-heeled friends of theirs mounted yet another establishment pro-corporate welfare candidate against him in the primary. He was put in a position to prove all the good things he had done in his first two terms. This is measured by how much money you bring back home, because its hard to argue for all the things you prevented from happening after all. He sent out slick multi-colored mailers saying how he has been endorsed by all the GOP hierarchy in my state. I'm sure he'll do well in the primary, and I'm supposed to go vote in a couple of hours but I don't know what I'm going to do. I refuse to vote for his opponent, but my friend has become , unfortunately, the lesser of two evils.I say that knowing that, in all probability he will read this.
Please understand that all of this breaks my heart. I really like the guy. We love his family, and I'm sure he thinks he's stayed by the stuff. I know the typical wisdom is that you do what you have to do to get the job done. The typical thinking is that without powerful friends, without playing the game you can't get anything accomplished. I'm sure he would make the argument that it takes a lot to get there, and it takes a lot to stay there. I'm certain the case could be made that he wasn't elected to represent just the libertarians, but the whole district..
My point in all this is not that my friend got caught up in pragmatism, but rather that politics is a horrible filthy, comprising business. You have to go day in and day out and deal with people who have made it their life's work the practice of acquiring power over other men. What are the odds they won't get any power over you? They charm and manipulate for a living. What are the odds you can carry that fire in your bosom and not get burned? How can you hope to escape without selling off at least a portion of your soul?
If government isn't the answer, then getting involved in government cannot possibly be the answer. Those of us that truly want liberty cannot worry and fret ourselves with running for office. The odds aren't that you will convert the machinery to the cause of liberty; the odds are that you will be converted. You will be assimilated, and you might not even realize it. If you feel yourself in any danger of 'playing the game', your only hope is to resign and run as far away from the halls of power as you can. Let lesser men seek power over other men, we've got a world to build.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)